Criticism of the National Health Service (England)
페이지 정보
작성자 Connie 댓글 0건 조회 1회 작성일 25-06-08 09:49본문

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes problems such as access, waiting lists, healthcare protection, and different scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the openly financed healthcare system of England, produced under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour federal government of Clement Attlee. It has come under much criticism, particularly throughout the early 2000s, due to outbreaks of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the involvement of the NHS in scandals extends back many years, including over the provision of psychological healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (eventually part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and overspends on healthcare facility newbuilds, consisting of Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the cost of which soared from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]
Access controls and waiting lists

In making health care a largely "invisible expense" to the client, healthcare appears to be effectively free to its customers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To lower costs and ensure that everyone is dealt with equitably, there are a variety of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) operates as a primary gatekeeper - without a recommendation from a GP, it is frequently impossible to get higher courses of treatment, such as a consultation with a consultant. These are argued to be required - Welshman Bevan kept in mind in a 1948 speech in your home of Commons, "we shall never have all we need ... expectations will constantly surpass capacity". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide health insurance coverage systems in other nations (e.g. Germany) have actually done without the requirement for recommendation; direct access to a specialist is possible there. [3]
There has been concern about opportunistic "health tourists" travelling to Britain (mainly London) and using the NHS while paying nothing. [4] British people have actually been known to take a trip to other European countries to make the most of lower expenses, and since of a fear of hospital-acquired super bugs and long waiting lists. [5]
NHS gain access to is for that reason controlled by medical top priority instead of price mechanism, resulting in waiting lists for both consultations and surgical treatment, as much as months long, although the Labour federal government of 1997-onwards made it among its crucial targets to minimize waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation might be 2 years; there were aspirations to decrease it to 18 weeks in spite of opposition from doctors. [6] It is objected to that this system is fairer - if a medical grievance is severe and dangerous, a client will reach the front of the queue quickly.

The NHS determines medical need in regards to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a method of measuring the advantage of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this technique of allocating healthcare indicates some clients need to lose out in order for others to get, and that QALY is a crude method of making life and death decisions. [8]
Hospital acquired infections

There have actually been numerous fatal outbreaks of antibiotic resistant germs (" incredibly bugs") in NHS health centers, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has led to criticism of standards of health across the NHS, with some patients purchasing private medical insurance or travelling abroad to prevent the viewed danger of capturing a "incredibly bug" while in health center. However, the department of health promised ₤ 50 million for a "deep tidy" of all NHS England medical facilities in 2007. [10]
Coverage
The lack of availability of some treatments due to their viewed bad cost-effectiveness in some cases leads to what some call a "postcode lottery". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the first gatekeeper, and analyze the expense efficiency of all drugs. Until they have actually issued guidance on the expense and efficiency of brand-new or expensive medications, treatments and procedures, NHS services are not likely to provide to money courses of treatment. The very same of real of the Consortium, NICE's counterpart in Scotland. [13]
There has been considerable debate about the public health financing of costly drugs, notably Herceptin, due to its high expense and viewed minimal overall survival. The campaign waged by cancer patients to get the federal government to spend for their treatment has actually gone to the greatest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it licensed. [14] [15] Your Home of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug business for bringing in drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limit that is considered the optimum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative
Before the concept of personal finance effort (PFI) pertained to prominence, all new health center structure was by convention moneyed from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise money and able to control public sector expenditure. In June 1994, the Capital Investment Manual (CIM) was published, setting out the terms of PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital tasks (structure of brand-new centers) had to take a look at whether PFI was more effective to utilizing public sector financing. By the end of 1995, 60 fairly little projects had been planned for, at an overall expense of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, structures were built and serviced by the private sector, and then leased back to the NHS. The Labour government elected under Tony Blair in 1997 welcomed PFI jobs, believing that public spending needed to be curtailed. [16]
Under the private finance effort, an increasing variety of healthcare facilities have actually been developed (or rebuilt) by private sector consortia, although the federal government likewise encouraged private sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been considerable criticism of this, with a research study by a consultancy company which works for the Department of Health revealing that for every ₤ 200 million invested on independently financed health centers the NHS loses 1000 doctors and nurses. The first PFI health centers consist of some 28% fewer beds than the ones they replaced. [18] Along with this, it has been kept in mind that the return for construction companies on PFI agreements could be as high as 58%, and that in financing health centers from the personal rather than public sector cost the NHS almost half a billion pounds more every year. [19]
Scandals
Several high-profile medical scandals have taken place within the NHS throughout the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, consisting of children's organs, in between 1988 and 1995. The main report into the occurrence, the Redfern Report, revealed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had actually ordered the "dishonest and illegal removing of every organ from every kid who had actually had a postmortem." In reaction, it has actually been argued that the scandal brought the issue of organ and tissue contribution into the general public domain, and highlighted the benefits to medical research study that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s related to opioid deaths. [21]
The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s worried unusually high mortality rates amongst clients at the medical facility. [22] [23] As much as 1200 more clients died in between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of healthcare facility [24] [25] based upon figures from a death model, however the last Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misinforming to connect the inadequate care to a particular number or variety of varieties of deaths. [26] A public query later exposed several circumstances of disregard, incompetence and abuse of patients. [27]
" Lack of independence of checking for security and fitness for purpose"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have degenerated healthcare, NHS England is operated on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.
The group charged in England and Wales with examining if the care delivered by the NHS is really safe and suitable for purpose is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC describes itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it remains in fact "liable to the public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its financing comes from the taxpayer. At least one chairman, one president [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.
There is for that reason the potential for a conflict of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the same leadership and both are highly prone to political interference.
In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins urged NHS England to focus on evidence and security in gender dysphoria treatment following concerns raised by the Cass Review. NHS demanded cooperation from adult clinics and initiated an evaluation, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum criticized limitations on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall invited the review's concentrate on kids's wellness. [28] [29]
See also
National Health Service
List of healthcare facilities in England
Healthcare in the UK
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission
Notes
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the initial on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: results of a routine information analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher rules to ensure that individuals do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health tourists could get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors assault Blair's waiting list pledge". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the initial on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the initial on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do hospitals make you ill?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleansing under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lottery game'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the original on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug rejected for NHS use". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to bring out thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the initial on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI health centers 'costing NHS extra ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances required for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport healthcare facility deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, guard dog says". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding mistakes 'ought to be criminal offence'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'may have led to 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford health center scandal: Approximately 1,200 may have died over "shocking" client care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "How lots of people passed away "needlessly" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit medical facility escapes cross-examination". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister informs NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult centers". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England should end 'culture of secrecy' in kids's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References
Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
External links

NHS.
Further reading
Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.