II., Sec. 18, and by the aforesaid registration regulation of claimed State, permitted March 10, 1871, it is delivered and declared, that only "male citizens" of the United States, and so forth., are entitled or permitted to vote. The plaintiff even more states, that wishing to workout her privilege as a citizen of the United States, and vote for Electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, and for a Representative in Congress, and for other officers, at the General Election held in November, 1872: While said defendant was so performing as Registrar, on said 15th working day of October, 1872, she appeared prior to him, at his place of work aforesaid, and then and there available to consider and subscribe the oath to aid the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Missouri, as essential by the registration law of reported State, approved March 10, 1871, and respectfully utilized to him to be registered as a lawful voter, which mentioned defendant then and there refused to do. There is a large array of discretion in regard to the votes offered by the male sex.

I decided in the situation this early morning, which numerous of you heard, probably, that less than the law as it stands the ladies who available their votes had no correct to vote whatsoever. Tyranny in Rochester.-The arrest and imprisonment in our metropolis jail of the Election Inspectors who acquired the votes of Susan B. Anthony and other women, at the polls of the Eighth Ward, some months ago, is a petty but malicious act of tyranny, of which the officers who are dependable for it will yet be ashamed. An act of Congress declares that the papers of official settlement shall be prima facie evidence of the issue of the accounts. Art. I. Sec. 9.-Which declares that no Bill of Attainder shall be handed. Be it enacted, and so on., as follows: Sec. Beverly W. Jones, Edwin T. Marsh, and William B. Hall, Inspectors of Election in and for claimed 1st election district of stated eight ward of stated town of Rochester, and many others., did then and there knowingly and willfully sign up as a voter of said District, 1 Susan B. Anthony, she, claimed Susan B. Anthony, then and there not remaining entitled to be registered as a voter of reported District in that she, mentioned Susan B. Anthony was then and there a individual of the woman sexual intercourse, contrary to the kind of the statute of the United States of America in these kinds of scenario designed and offered, and in opposition to the peace of the United States of America and their dignity.

The statute indicates, as your petitioner is encouraged, and humbly submits, a expertise in truth, not a knowledge falsely imputed by legislation to a bash not possessing it in reality, as the decide in this case has held. Therefore, for streaming porno sites the reason that the high-quality has been imposed by a courtroom of the United States for an offense triable by jury, with out the exact currently being submitted to the jury, and since the courtroom assumed to by itself the correct to enter a verdict without having submitting the case to the jury, and in buy that the judgment of the House of Representatives, if it concur with the judgment of the committee, may well, in the most sign and extraordinary type, mark its resolve to sustain in its integrity the typical-law right of demo by jury, your committee suggest that the prayer of the petitioner be granted, and to this stop report the pursuing bill, with the recommendation that it do move. But admitting the existence of the difference in between the authorized ability and the ethical correct of juries, even now the decision of the courtroom on the trial of Miss Anthony was erroneous, simply because the court did not instruct the jury in regard to the law, and then leave the jury to conduct their responsibility in the premises.

The impression in this situation was shipped by Chief-Justice Shaw, and is alternatively a dialogue of what is a handy distribution of powers among the courtroom and jury than an assessment into the precise point out of the law and he neither cites nor refers to a one authority from the starting to the close of the opinion. If a married girl was entitled to vote, or if a married female was not entitled to vote, and a single girl was entitled to vote, I imagine the inspectors would have a right in a scenario in advance of them, to judge on the evidence whether the human being ahead of them was married or single. Unfortunately the United States has no "very well-purchased technique of jurisprudence." A citizen may be experimented with, condemned, and put to dying by the faulty judgment of a single inferior decide, and no court docket can grant him relief or a new trial.